one consider this carefully and he will see that all these imaginary losses are utterly without consequence to nature, and that not only does she not condemn them, but she proves to us by innumerable examples that she wants and desires them. Why, if these losses disturbed her and if progeniture was so essential to her, would a woman be able to spend only one third of her life in its service, and would half the beings that she produces leave her hands with a distaste for this progeniture that is nevertheless demanded by her? It would be better to say that she permits the species to multiply, but she does not demand it, and in the certain knowledge that there will always be more individuals than she has a need for, she is far from thwarting the partialities of those who are not in the habit of procreating, and find conformity with such a custom repugnant to them."
-
"The father of four children, no one can say that I haven't done my share but still ... there is something left over. While I'm considered unprediotable by many, I'm considered to be well adJusted and only the objects of my desires know of my penchant.
"Being a vice-president of a local firm, I can't have my name used, so must remain anonymous."
J.L., Washington, D.C.
"My compliments for the intelligent and dignified manner in which you are apparently attempting to aid yourselves and others in the solution of your mutual and indi vidual problems."
"Enclosed are fees for subscription, as indicated, and my best wishes.
"Thank you for sharing your information with us, at Sun-
29